Thameslink 2000 Inspector's Report 2006
Table of contents
- 1. Introduction
- 2. The Case for Network Rail Infrastructure Limited
- 2.1 Introduction
- 2.2 Aims & Objectives, Policy Changes, Funding & Other Significant Changes
- 2.3 Alternatives
- 2.4 Effects on Local Residents and Businesses in terms of Pedestrian and Vehicular Traffic Flows, Noise, Vibration and Dust
- 2.5 Adequacy of Environmental Statement (ES)
- 2.6 Farringdon Station and the Surrounding Area (Applications TL1, TL10, TL11, TL18 and TL22)
- 2.7 Blackfriars Station and the Surrounding Area (Applications TL2, TL6, TL7,TL8, TL20 and TL21)
- 2.8 Borough Market and the Surrounding Area (Applications TL3, TL4, TL5, TL9, TL13, TL14, TL15, TL19, TL23, TL24, TL25, TL26 and TL29)
- 2.10 Conditions and Agreements
- Review of Previous Recommendations 2.11
- 2.12 Conclusions
- 3. The Cases for Supporters
- 3.1 Thameslink 2000 Consortium - Supporter 34A
- 3.2.Written Representations in support
- 4. Southwark Cathedral - Representation 235A
- 4.1. The Case for Southwark Cathedral
- 4.2. Response by Network Rail
- 5. Professor Clare Johnston - Representation 282A
- 5.1 The Case for Professor Johnston
- 6. London Borough of Southwark - Representation 575A
- 6.1 The Case for London Borough of Southwark
- 6.2. Response by Network Rail
- 7. Cathedral Area Residents' Association/Bankside Residents Forum - Representations 589A/434A
- 7.1 The Case for CARA/BRF
- 7.2. Response by Network Rail
- 8. Star Television Programmes Limited - Representation 599A
- 8.1. The Case for Star Television Programmes Limited
- 9. London Borough of Lambeth - Representation 654A
- 9.1. The Case for London Borough of Lambeth
- 9.2. Response by Network Rail
- 10. Andrew Nettleton - Representation 655A
- 10.1 The Case for Andrew Nettleton
- 11. South and West Transport Action Group (SAWTAG) - Representation 666A
- 11.1 The Case for South and West Transport Action Group
- 11.2.Response by Network Rail
- 12. London TravelWatch (Formerly London Transport Users Committee) - Representation 671A
- 12.1. The Case for London TravelWatch
- 12.2. Response by Network Rail
- 13. Simon Hughes MP - Representation 674A
- 13.1.The Case for Mr Hughes
- 14. Norwood Rail Users Group (NRUG) - Representation 1086A
- 14.1.The Case for Norwood Rail Users Group
- 14.2.Response by Network Rail
- 15. Clients Represented by Mr N J Winbourne - Representations 1080A, 1091A & 1112A
- 15.1.The Case for Mr Winbourne's Clients
- 15.2. Response by Network Rail
- 16. Mr P S Cox - Representation 1094A
- 16.1The Case for Mr Cox
- 16.2. Response by Network Rail
- 17. Written Representations
- 17.1.Written Representations
- 17.2.Response by Network Rail
- 18. Inspector's Conclusions
- 18.1.Introduction
- 18.2.Aims & Objectives, Policy Changes, Other Significant Changes & Funding
- 18.3.Alternatives
- 18.4.Effects on Local Residents and Businesses in terms of Pedestrian and Vehicular Traffic Flows, Noise, Vibration & Dust
- 18.5. Adequacy of Environmental Statement
- 18.6.Farringdon Station and the Surrounding Area (Applications TL1, TL10, TL11, TL18 and TL22)
- 18.7.Blackfriars Station and the Surrounding Area (Applications TL2, TL6, TL7, TL8, TL20 and TL21)
- 18.8.Borough Market and the Surrounding Area (Applications TL3, TL4, TL5, TL9, TL13, TL14, TL15, TL19, TL23, TL24, TL25, TL26 and TL29
- 18.9.London Bridge Station and the Surrounding Area
- 18.10.Outer Areas (Applications TL16 and TL17)
- 18.11.Order and Deemed Planning Applications (TL27 and TL28)
- 18.12.Conditions
- 19. Overall Conclusions and Recommendation
- Appendix 1 - Appearances
- Appendix 2 - Documents
- Appendix 3 - Site Visits
- Appendix 4 - Glossary
- Appendix 5 - Cross reference between statement of matters and conclusions in the report
Back to top
Policy, guidance and research
External website
Pop-up window
Rich text format file
Adobe PDF file
Word file
Excel file
WinZip file