Summary of responses to consultation on RTFO's carbon and sustainability reporting requirements
Table of contents
- Introduction
- Question 1. Is the general scope of the reporting requirement set out in chapter 2 appropriate?
- Question 2. Is the Meta-Standard approach suggested in chapter 3 appropriate?
- Question 3. Are the Environmental and Social principles set out in chapter 3 the right ones?
- Question 4: Do the proposals for the content of monthly reports set out in chapter 3 provide enough detail - is there other information we should require?
- Question 5: Is there other information that should be required in the annual reporting requirements set out in chapter 4?
- Question 6: Are the targets for reporting in chapter 4 appropriate - should they be higher / lower?
- Question 7: Is our approach to the chain of custody set out in chapter 5 a sensible one?
- Question 8: Are we right not to allow C&S information to be transferred in an equivalence trade - chapter 5?
- Question 9: Is our approach to verification set out in chapter 6 appropriate?
- Question 10: Are there any other standards that should be benchmarked from the outset?
- Question 11: Is excluding by-product reporting as suggested in Annex A appropriate? - Are the by-products suggested in Annex A the right ones?
- Question 12: Is the exemption for mechanised farming suggested in Annex A appropriate?
- Question 13: Are the carbon intensity default values set out in Annex F correct?
- Question 14: Is the approach to assessing the impact of land use change set out in Annex G appropriate?
- Question 15: Are the costs of complying with guidance as set out in the Partial Regulatory Impact Assessment for the draft Renewable Transport Fuel Obligations Order 2007 broadly correct?
- Next steps
