Summary of responses to DfT's consultation on the reform of the CRS Code of Conduct
Table of contents
- Introduction
- Consultation response analysis
- Question 1: Do you think it is appropriate to allow CRS and carriers to negotiate prices and contractual terms and conditions?
- Question 2: Do you agree with the provisions for non-discrimination regarding contractual conditions, distribution facilities and display criteria?
- Question 3: Do you think that marketing, booking and sales data should be made available by system vendors to all participating carriers? If so, should this be done without subscriber (agency) identification?
- Question 4: Do you think that the definition of parent carriers in Article 2 is appropriate?
- Question 5: Do you consider the specific rules for parent carriers to be necessary, and if so, are they sufficient to guard against potential anti-competitive abuses?
- Question 6: How do you think prices charged by CRS to carriers under the mandatory participation rule should be regulated?
- Question 7: Do you think that the provisions on data protection are appropriate?
- Question 8: Do you agree that the proposed Code of Conduct should replace the existing Regulation, and that the matter should be revisited in five years?
- Question 9: Are there any proposals, not covered above, on which you wish to express a view?
- Question 10: Do you think that there are other ways in which the existing regulatory regime might be improved?
- Question 11: Are there any other issues connected with the reservation market which you would like to see addressed?
- Annex A
- List of respondents to CRS Code of Conduct Consultation
- List of attendees at Stakeholder Symposium (18 January 2008)
